Reply: Runewars:: Variants:: Re: No rout on retreat for neutral units and...
by Shikyo Yeah I have gone all in Terinoth and have a complete Descent 1st edition Collection and a chunk of runbound sprinkled with DungeonQuest so I know what you mean :)I'll most likely get it if we...
View ArticleReply: Runewars:: General:: Re: First vs Revised Edition
by horlaci Do the faction sheets of the revised edition match in quality those to the Banners of War expansion? (I mean the additional unit pictures that You put beside Your faction sheet)Or are in the...
View ArticleReply: Runewars:: General:: Re: First vs Revised Edition
by Anduinhorlaci wrote:Do the faction sheets of the revised edition match in quality those to the Banners of War expansion? (I mean the additional unit pictures that You put beside Your faction...
View ArticleReply: Runewars:: General:: Re: Runewars after first play - dissapointed
by AmaranthBloodfist707 wrote:Don't forget about title cards also. If you can't get close enough to one resource type get the one that gives you two extra (your choice) every harvest.That title is only...
View ArticleReply: Runewars:: General:: Re: Is this game for me? And what good...
by yshild I don´t see Runebound: Sands of Al-Kalim in your collection. You really should give this a try if you liked Runebound and looking for something similar. It doesn´t just provide more of the...
View ArticleThread: Runewars:: General:: did FFG make a mistake to publish the revised...
by Katya1firstly, apologies in advance in case not writing proper english, its notmy 1st language.secondly, do you feel FFG made a marketing error by not incorporating twosets of new army expansions or...
View ArticleReply: Runewars:: General:: Re: did FFG make a mistake to publish the revised...
by Fwing If there are to be more races added to Runewars they should come separately from the existing products.If FFG had pulled a nasty trick like you suggest, they would have lost a lot of...
View ArticleReply: Runewars:: General:: Re: did FFG make a mistake to publish the revised...
by Shooock I do not understand why people think that the revised edition is different from the big box.The FFG instead of reprint the big box has released this smaller, for convenience. STOP.If they...
View ArticleReply: Runewars:: General:: Re: did FFG make a mistake to publish the revised...
by ropya I agree with Ed here. I own both the 1ed and expansion for it. So I have no interest in picking up the revised edition. If they had done as you suggested it would have turned me off the game...
View ArticleReply: Runewars:: General:: Re: did FFG make a mistake to publish the revised...
by MrMT Welcome to the game and the geek!But I have to agree with the other posters here; it would have been a poor move to "force" people to buy the new edition for a couple of extra pieces.
View ArticleReply: Runewars:: General:: Re: did FFG make a mistake to publish the revised...
by FwingShooock wrote:I do not understand why people think that the revised edition is different from the big box.Plastic mountains.Punch-board player sheets instead of card.They aren't huge...
View ArticleReply: Runewars:: General:: Re: did FFG make a mistake to publish the revised...
by sigmazero13 My understanding is the revised edition was largely done as a way to reprint the game, as the big-box model had become lest cost-viable to produce. Some of the components had to be...
View ArticleReply: Runewars:: General:: Re: did FFG make a mistake to publish the revised...
by Jan Tuijpsigmazero13 wrote:[..]they weren't looking to suck old players into buying the new one, but rather make the game available to people who didn't already had it[..]Yep. I remember it being...
View ArticleReply: Runewars:: General:: Re: did FFG make a mistake to publish the revised...
by selwyth Plus if army sets were replaced instead of added to, new adopters would have to hunt down the out-of-print 1ed to get the original armies.Only the publisher would even consider ripping off...
View ArticleReply: Runewars:: General:: Re: did FFG make a mistake to publish the revised...
by Mr Skeletor They should have followed up revised quickly with a new army expansion. I'm not sure why they havn't.
View ArticleReply: Runewars:: General:: Re: did FFG make a mistake to publish the revised...
by MrMTMr Skeletor wrote:They should have followed up revised quickly with a new army expansion. I'm not sure why they havn't. I assuming because it didn't sell well enough to justify it?
View ArticleReply: Runewars:: General:: Re: did FFG make a mistake to publish the revised...
by age of Gods I for one would have purchased the revise edition in order to get my hands on the new races.I keep reading these posts suggesting it is a poor way of doing business if FFG would have...
View ArticleReply: Runewars:: General:: Re: did FFG make a mistake to publish the revised...
by corkysruage of Gods wrote:I for one would have purchased the revise edition in order to get my hands on the new races.I would have too... if i found the game on massive clearance somewhereage of...
View ArticleReply: Runewars:: General:: Re: did FFG make a mistake to publish the revised...
by sigmazero13age of Gods wrote:Are you kidding ?Would all of you tomorrow not pay for a expansion which includes new races ? you would have opened up your wallets instantly.Big difference, I think....
View ArticleReply: Runewars:: General:: Re: did FFG make a mistake to publish the revised...
by ff13 How about this:Each revise edition would have 4 factions but each box would have different factions limited to 4.So one game would have the 4 factions from the game, another game could have had...
View Article