by sigmazero13
lumpthing wrote:
Well I agree that the player misinterpreted the card, but he insisted his interpretation was clearly correct, and was already annoyed with my rules-lawyerism, so I just let it pass.
Frankly, I would say his rules-lawyerism far surpasses yours, since he was not even playing the card as written - he was playing it during bidding, not before :) For him to try and claim he was playing it before takes quite a stretch of evil rules-lawyering (IE, rules-lawyering done in a way to benefit oneself unfairly).