Quantcast
Channel: Runewars | BoardGameGeek
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 7103

Reply: Runewars:: General:: Re: Out of the top 50...

$
0
0

by corkysru

MScrivner wrote:

senorcoo wrote:

I blame the revised edition. :p


Seconded.

I disagree. I just blame the mentioned cult of the new. I'll just wait around until they discover the poisoned koolade and we can take things over again.

MScrivner wrote:


But I will also add that the cult of the new is trending toward shorter and shorter games, that are lighter and lighter in their scope and game play. The three-to-four-hour Ameritrash glory days seem to be over. Everyone wants fast food gaming. Even Eclipse takes epic sci-fi gaming (ala TI3) and waters it down to cube-pushing resource management that's finished in under two hours.

Ecrapse doesn't take TI anywhere. It does not even touch the game play of TI. ........... i'm too lazy/busy to type the needed rant here. But you get the idea.

MScrivner wrote:


Oh well. We die-hard fans all know - Runewars is a masterpiece, 3D mountains or not, and will keep playing it while the wood-fondlers ooooh and aaaaaah over gimmicks like moving gear worker placement and Deck: The Shuffling. At least Twilight Struggle remains in the top position.

edit: this thread also made be go back and take a long hard look at my ratings of games in general, and I think I am being overly generous in some places so I edited them down - not as a reaction to this situation, but more as an awareness that if I really do love RW so much (and I do) than other games should not be so highly rated.

Long live the epicness of FFG coffin boxes.. wether they still come in coffins or not!

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 7103

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>